Sunday, November 8, 2009

Ahead On These Shoes

Ahead On These Shoes

You don't know you can't see these moons
Teenage lust rings most true
No matter how random they choose
You are old and wise and untrue

Confused emotions are always more true
Move forward with this Western news

____
for Caroline 11/6 or 1 2009

Posted via email from nicholasr's posterous

Wednesday, November 4, 2009

5 Great 2007 Albums of 2009

2007 was such a great year for new music, that I am still finding awesome albums released in that year.  Some by way of great 2009 releases.  (Sorry 2008, you are the bad meat in a lose sandwich.)  So that is why I am posting this list of

Great Albums Released in 2007 That I Didn't Get Around to Loving Until This Year

*Love is Simple by Akron/Family - the band was suggested to me after I got into Dirty Projectors and Grizzly Bear
*Strawberry Jam by Animal Collective - I heard this in 2008 at least but I only very recently came to really appreciate it, (well after I got into Merriweather Post Pavillion) and hear the "noise" turn into music.
*Emotionalism by The Avett Brothers - 2009 single led me to this album
*Marry Me by St. Vincent.  I loved this year's "Actor" and went back and loved its predecessor.
*Grand Forks by Tom Brosseau - 2009 single led me to this album

2009 has seen follow ups to each of the five albums on the list.  I prefer the 2007 albums.  (I am amazed I can say that.)

honorable mention
*Smokey Rolls Down Thunder Canyon by Devendra Banhart - I got into Alela Diane and was introduced to the term "New Weird America." I heard some of his earlier stuff and this album seemed well recommended.  He may be too hip for me.  Sea Horse is a great song.  But, some songs - especially Shabop Shalom - well executed and clever as they are, undermine my ability to connect emotionally to other songs.  Like Saved.  Can I enjoy the emotion and strength of that song honestly?  Or do a need a bunch of irony?  How much irony?  I know I like ironic music and slightly ironic music and music with ironic nods in them, but I think Banhart may have crossed some sort of hipster line only reachable by the L train into Brooklyn.  So, maybe later I'll have a Strawberry Jam type re-evaluation of this, but as of right now, this album doesn't really belong on the list as I don't currently *love* it.  But it is good.  But I haven't bought his 2009 release.

Posted via email from nicholasr's posterous

Friday, October 30, 2009

This Halloween and Day of the Dead, Won't You Please Take Some Time Trying to Accept Your Mortality (or at least other people's mortality)

"How can we not be united against death?" - Keith Olberman

People die, it is what we do.  If people didn't die, none of us would be alive; there would be no need for new people.  Death is a real help in bringing new perspectives to a changing world.  You have formative experiences.  People are designed to extrapolate patterns based on tiny occurrences.  Some of them are bound to be wrong.  And what was true need not be true now, so it isn't helpful to believe it anymore.  In any event, there is nothing you can do to prevent you from dying.  No matter how many times your life is saved, YOU WILL DIE.  Accept it.  Get over it.  Those are the rules and no one can change them.

We, as a nation, will never be able to have anything close to a useful debate on healthcare reform until we admit that people, even American citizens, die.  As it is, the "debate" is constantly derailed by politicians raising the grim specter of death as a way of dismissing anything the otherside has to offfer.  As it is now, the success rate of the American Healthcare system against death is a dismal 0%.  And, any change to the system is going to have the end result of 100% of Americans dying.  So, it is more that the "leaders" of "our" "discussion" on healthcare refrom that need to accept death before there can even be a beginning to honest debate.  Because they keep running down the middle of the street screaming about how "they" are so heartless as to allow people to die.  (People, of course, in this case being US citizens, we can all agree that the millions of "illegal" immigrants here can just drop dead right away)

But it would help if American society could come to terms with death - just a little bit.  In movies, it is a happy ending if all the main characters live and a sad ending if main characters die.  Like if we don't see them die, they don't.  A driving force of our healthcare system (that argue in favor all you want about certain parts of it, it is broken and has been getting steadily worse in all the ways it was already getting  worse in back in the HillaryCare Horror of 1993 - 16 years.) is this grim determniation to "fight" death.  A survival instinct is natural, fine.  But death, also natural.

People can be suffering their whole lives, getting sick from preventable causes, but once it gets to the point where they are about to die, HOLY SHIT! death is wrong!  Break out the ambulances and the wild technological advances.  And, ok, we saved you from dying just then, but, it looks like you are going to die.  Well, I am super rich and I will do WHATEVER IT TAKES to keep myself from dying (death, again, is unAmerican, and a sign of personal weakness, I've never believed in it myself).  There are some good things that came out of this do whatever it takes approach.  It has sparked innovation.  There are people willing to pay for and undergo risky new procedures becaue of this insane rejection of death as "an option," 

America has come up with some kickass medical procedures to cheat  death for weeks at a time.  Of course, then uppermiddle class people try and get in on it, and then it gets into magazines and shit and people who can't afford insanely expensive procedures find out about them, and they too will do whatever it takes.  And just going back to the emergency room, anyone who is actively dying, we go all out in stopping that.  I mean, that is a different part of the whole healthcare problem.

However wrong it seems there is something definitely UnAmerican about not letting the super-rich using their (taxed) riches to keep themselves alive no matter the cost.  I mean, that is their right.  Here, your money counts as speech and counts as how important you are seen by your peers, and so why not in how you die.  I mean, the Joneses spent 5 million dollars keeping their father alive, we can't spend less than that.  We would be giving in to death.

Ok, so one of the problems is with procedures that don't make sense that were only invented to fit the fancies of the rich, and are only brought to a wider audience because people just can't die.  We as a nation can't stand around while people die.

Shit.  I didn't mean to get into every part of healthcare - it is so complicated and none of the actual issues have really been addressed soberly because of the whole American psychosis about death.  We aren't united against death, except at the very end, unless you are an "illegal" immigrant.

But, the main, easiest thing to do, without any type of grotesque pork for insurance companies, is to create a Public Option for second tier health care.  This will give people access to treatment that will keep them from unnecssarilly dying at age 30 or 50.  And it will go a HUGE way towards keeping a lock on the insanely rising cost of health insurance. 

All of the other things are for later.  But even that one simple thing, which would help everyone (because you know emergency room visits and not being able to pay for care which makes hospitals and doctors raise their prices for people who can afford care, which leads to insurance companies raising their premiums and denying more coverage because they don't want to deal with these huge costs.  With higher insurance and hospital and doctor costs, people who used to be able to pay are now no longer able to pay.  This results in costs spiralling out of control, trying to get enough money from the ever dwindling population of people who can pay)

That one is sort of simple.  But we can't even do that because you get bozos yelling at each other about death.

So, please, (assuming someone is reading this) use this Halloween and the Day of the Dead to try and come to terms at least a little about your mortality.  You will die.  And so will everyone you know and love.  It is just the rules.  It is okay to not want someone close to you die, but they will and if not know, later.  Read around, find some nice rituals form other cultures.  Americans are good appropriatiors of other cultures.

Posted via email from nicholasr's posterous

Thursday, October 29, 2009

zaireeka spells success

I am very happy right now.  I just had one of the most consistently synchronized simultaneous playing of all for discs of The Flaming Lips Zaireeka Box Set.  I have been listening to them more with the release of Embryonic (I got it on amazon as an mp3 for $8.  (oh also, at the same time, I got The Avett Brothers Emotionalism for $5. - I knew at the time that 2007 was one of the best years for music in a while - but I keep finding other albums that came out that year.)  and I also got my Christmas on Mars Soundtrack and Zaireeka back. 

The packaging says it best  ZAIREEKA/ 4 Compact Discs/ WARNING: This is a unique recording.  These eight compostitionsare to be played using as many as four compact disc players, and have synchronized start times.  This Recording also contains frequencies not normally heard on sommercial recordings and on rare occasion has caused the listener to become disoriented. // FLAMING LIPS/ EXPERIMENT with multiple sound sources, listener participation, and new dimensions of sound.

I sort of cheated by having my computer play disc 3 and 4 at the same time through the same set of speakers.  And you can listen to any one on its own or do one or two or three in various combinations.  It can be hard to set up all four.  But all four really changes the experience.  You are active in listening.  Even if you get everything synced that doesn't mean they are going to stay that way.  It helps to orientate because they all are supposed to say "This is track number X" at the same time and so pause anyones ahead and then go and you get a wonderful satisfaction hearing the rounds of "This is cd number One" "is CD number 2" This is cd number 3" "and number four" and they all match up and you can move around and listen to different parts louder or softer depending on which speaker you are closest to.

Ahhhhh.  That was such a great listening to music experience, I just had to mention it to the internet void.  Now it is back to laundry and looking for a new volunteer job. But so refreshed.  In case you were wondering, they are songs, but they are weird songs and the bit about the frequencies is because they have four times the capacity as a regular cd, so they have all sorts of extra percussion and extra instruments and stuff that you couldn't normally fit it all into one cd.  They explained it in the awesome documentary "Fearless Freaks"

Posted via email from nicholasr's posterous

Wednesday, October 28, 2009

Why Does Rock and Roll Constantly Need Saving?

I was discussing what I had just dubbed the Paul McCartney Paradox (I don't think it is a paradox but it is something) which involves Paul McCartney releasing a new album.  Imagine a younger person.  Paul McCartney and record labels and advertisements and prominent displays, and radio play, and press overage have all been telling this person to buy Paul McCartney's new album.  But they don't say.  You should buy all of the Beatles Albums, certain Wings albums, and certain superior Paul McCartney solo albums before buying this one, which frankly isn't his best, despite the catchy single, Dance Tonight.

So, should all McCartney albums have a sticker on the front with all the albums you should buy before you buy this one.  Or do you just have people buy it because it is new.

Anyways, I went into making fun of his 2007 single Dance Tonight which came out in favor of dancing tonight.  But, the song didn't make you dance.  Dance Tonight was offered up as a suggestion for something you could do later while listening to a different song.

This led me to the easy joke about rock bands always talking about rocking rather than rocking.  Kiss I'm looking at you.  Go ahead and rock all night and party every day, I am not stopping you.  And on stage always with the "are you ready to rock?" the correct answer is not yes but, "whoooo"

A day before, while watching A Serious Man  (which is really good but it has an air of them cashing in their No Money For Old Men Oscar chits.  The hardest I laughed was when the movie ended, because it ended when it did),
 
I saw a trailer for Pirate Radio  staring Phillip "Lester Bangs" S Hoffman and Bill "old rocker in Still Crazy and Love Actually" Nighy.  The trailer voice over contains the line, "The motley crue that saved rock and roll."  Why is Rock and Roll so contantly in danger.  How can something raw, pure and primal be so delicate as to necessitate lenghty rituals in order to prepare people to receive it.

It is easy, they go out of their way to be as shocking as possible in an attempt to generate controversy and perceived enemies.  Rock and Roll needs to be persecuted and it needs their Kenneth "the government drip in the trailer" Branaugh straw men to be opposed to.

All of this thinking kept reminding of one other thing that acted in very similar ways: Christianity and Christians.  They are always under constant threat - from people they invented, from things they brought upon themselves on purpose, or just ordinary straw men.  There are other links between Christianity and Rock and Roll, making me believe that Christianity had a lot of influence on Rock and Roll.  From heavy metals surface satan worship, to the ease the Creed and other Christian bands can just put in Jesus Lyrics into existing rock and roll and make it Christian, to the early call of Rock and Roll being called the devil's music, from the christian influence in the immediate pre-cursors to rock and roll.

But most of all the constant concern for its very existence.  The Devil or The Man is out to destroy Christanity and Rock and Roll - even though they are supposed to be super-naturally powerful forces.  There is more to this and someone has presumably noticed it before and looked into how much it is there.  At least, Rock and Roll came about as young people's participation in organized religion began to drop.  The mythology, the rituals, the sacred and the profane.  The sects and schisms.  I haven't thought it all out.

Posted via email from nicholasr's posterous

Monday, October 19, 2009

would have been in van nuys earlier if I brought the paper I need here to my 10 am Westwood appt. like I meant to.

Posted via SMS from nicholasr's posterous

Wednesday, October 14, 2009

"I spend a lot of time thinking about"

I tried to fill out an answer to this prompt  and the whole thing got a bit long.  I am stopping for the moment so this is what I have (with some revisions and deletions)

I spend a lot of time thinking about ...
outer space, the laws of thermodynamics, The Supreme Court, how much "god" cares about things I care about, The Dalai Lama, poems and stories, the empty space in atoms, koala bears, elephants with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, The North Pacific Gyre (covered with plastic)

bright things in front of me, dumb signs, positive affirmations, The Tao, records management, The Fourteenth Amendment, words and their meaning, authority, Fluxus, Yoko Ono, Wayne Coyne, Communism in Eastern Europe, Vaclav Havel, Richard Feynman, anarcho-syndicalism,

--- I cut it off here and below was deleted ... ooohhhh deleted scenes ---
power and Foucault's conception of it, how our government is so damned corrupt, how the Republicans, who HATED the federal government and wanted to destroy it, had a majority in the House of Representatives from 1994-2006, but managed to make the government WAY HUGER, giving it insane NEW powers, how to engage when I realized that no one was ever going to ask me what *specific* radical economic, social, political philosophies was the absolute best, so I maybe shouldn't spend SO much time trying to figure it out.

how I might stop paying attention to my thoughts for a time, what people with autism and asperger's syndrome did before we pathologized their lives, ways to appreciate the mind-boggling amazingness that is life, appreciating in those ways, what the vanity license plate on the car in front of me is supposed to mean, how anger ties us to suffering,

hating various things: The 1996 Telecommunication Act, Alexander Hamilton, Autism Speaks, Antonin Scalia, Thomas L Friedman, Robert McNamara, Oliver Cromwell, etc.,

Posted via email from nicholasr's posterous

Monday, October 5, 2009

28,177 songs played in four months

I have listened to a lot of music this summer. Listening to an insane amount of music has sort of kept me sane. I'm not quite sure how I managed an average of 223.6 songs per day and 9.3 per hour for the months of June, July, August, and September, but there you go. In case you were wondering, I listened to the band St. Vincent more than any other (2,340) with St. Vincent's "Actor" being the top album (1,288) and Tom Brosseau's Plaid Lined Jacket the most played song (201)

Posted via web from nicholasr's posterous

Sunday, October 4, 2009

Hilarious- 2012 - Exclusive Scene

There is no way I am seeing this movie. Normally if a movie clip made me laugh this much, I would be excited. But this causes laughter for all the wrong reasons. I mean this is just too fucking much.

Posted via web from nicholasr's posterous

Saturday, October 3, 2009

deep

"Save the babies! Save the babies! Save the babies! Save the babies!"
- Marvin Gaye - Save The Children - What's Going On

Posted via email from nicholasr's posterous